<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Your Bounce Rate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pixelpunk.com/bounce-rate-improvements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pixelpunk.com/bounce-rate-improvements/</link>
	<description>said and done</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:12:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelpunk.com/bounce-rate-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-14896</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelpunk.com/?p=474#comment-14896</guid>
		<description>Nice article.

I think deep linking may also affect bounce rate, meaning the search engines have gotten so good at serving the page that a visitor needs, they may not have a need to click another page.

Also, I looked at my report for the entire last year and noticed my site&#039;s bounce rate skyrocketed from mid 40&#039;s to mid 60&#039;s once images.google.com started sending traffic. Traffic is traffic I suppose, if they like what they see, they may visit something else, and that&#039;s the point really.

Then again, I&#039;m no SEO expert by any means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.</p>
<p>I think deep linking may also affect bounce rate, meaning the search engines have gotten so good at serving the page that a visitor needs, they may not have a need to click another page.</p>
<p>Also, I looked at my report for the entire last year and noticed my site&#8217;s bounce rate skyrocketed from mid 40&#8217;s to mid 60&#8217;s once images.google.com started sending traffic. Traffic is traffic I suppose, if they like what they see, they may visit something else, and that&#8217;s the point really.</p>
<p>Then again, I&#8217;m no SEO expert by any means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelpunk.com/bounce-rate-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-5812</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelpunk.com/?p=474#comment-5812</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Dan. Love your &lt;a href=&quot;http://danbowles.com&quot;&gt;photography and design&lt;/a&gt; site, BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dan. Love your <a href="http://danbowles.com">photography and design</a> site, BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelpunk.com/bounce-rate-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-5810</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelpunk.com/?p=474#comment-5810</guid>
		<description>Funny, I was curious what the bounce rate meant just the other day.  After reading this article, I get why many web design blogs I read have a &quot;similar/related posts&quot; section on the sidebar/article footer.

Thanks for the good read, Mike!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I was curious what the bounce rate meant just the other day.  After reading this article, I get why many web design blogs I read have a &#8220;similar/related posts&#8221; section on the sidebar/article footer.</p>
<p>Thanks for the good read, Mike!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
